Air Plane Buy Lease |

The Online Marketplace to Buy or Lease Airplanes
RSS Feed

In Plane Site- Part 6 of 6

Tuesday Nov 25, 2008

“In the phrase ‘conspiracy theory,’ there are two words. The first word, ‘conspiracy,’ the second word is the active word, ‘theory.’ By definition, a theory is a supposition, an idea, a concept, a hypothesis. Let me give you an example: In theory, if I purchase a raffle ticket, I could win a prize. Now as long as I don’t purchase a raffle ticket, my win is theoretical. But once you purchase a raffle ticket, the win is no longer a theory, it becomes a possibility, and the more raffle tickets you purchase, the more possible, and eventually probable, the win becomes. Such is the case with a conspiracy theory. As long as there’s no evidence, it is a conspiracy theory. But once you have a piece of evidence, no matter how flimsy or circumstantial it may be, it becomes a possibility, and the more evidence that is gathered, the more possible, and eventually probable, the conspiracy is.” - Dave vonKleist, host of The Power Hour, in his introduction to 911 IPS.

Narrator Dave vonKleist doesn’t editorialize or draw any conclusions. He simply sits in front of a video screen and points things out. 911 IPS will not bring you to tears like Fahrenheit 9/11. It comes from the brain, not the heart, making it a perfect companion piece. VonKleist asks the same questions that would occur to anybody looking at this footage. What the happened? This does not match the story we’ve all been told. What are those sparks of light that come from both WTC buildings the second before the collisions? It’s definitely not Arabs with box-cutters. If the Pentagon wasn’t hit by an airliner, and it sure looks like it wasn’t, then what the happened to flight 77?

These are big questions that no one seems to be asking, as though we need something else to add to our confusion. We’ll never know what really happened any more than we’ll ever know who killed JFK, but knowing that the official line is a crock of lies is the best jump start we can get on the road to truth.

Do you remember there was a giant explosion that shot 550 feet into the air above the U.S. Customs House at WTC 6, just northwest of the towers before they fell, a totally separate event that clearly had nothing to do with the plane crashes or hijackings, incontrovertible evidence that something else was going on? Neither did I, but 911 IPS has the footage from CNN. Do you remember that the outer wall of the Pentagon didn’t fall down until well after the attack, that firefighters stood there fighting a fire at an INTACT Pentagon before the wall came down, a wall with a round hole that clearly wasn’t made by an airplane? Neither did I, but 911 IPS has the footage from Fox News. (And just in keeping with the theme of What the Fuck?, do you remember that the FBI found two unexploded bombs in the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City. Neither did I, but 911 IPS has the footage from local coverage.)

Similarly, we see and hear eyewitnesses actually describing the “cruise missile” that hit the pentagon, some saying they didn’t see any windows in the planes that hit the WTCs, others saying the planes definitely didn’t have the American Airlines logo.

“…Dave vonKleist wove several key moments of live, unretouched film footage regarding the events of Sept. 11 into a crystal clear picture of official deception. The entire well-produced documentary is brought into sharp focus with Dave’s impeccably delivered narrative. IPS is hot and should be seen by everyone who has an opinion about what happened Sept. 11, 2001…” The Idaho Observer.

http://www.thepowerhour.com/
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2006/12/prweb493569.htm

Duration : 0:8:56

Read the rest of this entry »

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


In Plane Site- Part 5 of 6

Saturday Nov 22, 2008

“In the phrase ‘conspiracy theory,’ there are two words. The first word, ‘conspiracy,’ the second word is the active word, ‘theory.’ By definition, a theory is a supposition, an idea, a concept, a hypothesis. Let me give you an example: In theory, if I purchase a raffle ticket, I could win a prize. Now as long as I don’t purchase a raffle ticket, my win is theoretical. But once you purchase a raffle ticket, the win is no longer a theory, it becomes a possibility, and the more raffle tickets you purchase, the more possible, and eventually probable, the win becomes. Such is the case with a conspiracy theory. As long as there’s no evidence, it is a conspiracy theory. But once you have a piece of evidence, no matter how flimsy or circumstantial it may be, it becomes a possibility, and the more evidence that is gathered, the more possible, and eventually probable, the conspiracy is.” - Dave vonKleist, host of The Power Hour, in his introduction to 911 IPS.

Narrator Dave vonKleist doesn’t editorialize or draw any conclusions. He simply sits in front of a video screen and points things out. 911 IPS will not bring you to tears like Fahrenheit 9/11. It comes from the brain, not the heart, making it a perfect companion piece. VonKleist asks the same questions that would occur to anybody looking at this footage. What the happened? This does not match the story we’ve all been told. What are those sparks of light that come from both WTC buildings the second before the collisions? It’s definitely not Arabs with box-cutters. If the Pentagon wasn’t hit by an airliner, and it sure looks like it wasn’t, then what the happened to flight 77?

These are big questions that no one seems to be asking, as though we need something else to add to our confusion. We’ll never know what really happened any more than we’ll ever know who killed JFK, but knowing that the official line is a crock of lies is the best jump start we can get on the road to truth.

Do you remember there was a giant explosion that shot 550 feet into the air above the U.S. Customs House at WTC 6, just northwest of the towers before they fell, a totally separate event that clearly had nothing to do with the plane crashes or hijackings, incontrovertible evidence that something else was going on? Neither did I, but 911 IPS has the footage from CNN. Do you remember that the outer wall of the Pentagon didn’t fall down until well after the attack, that firefighters stood there fighting a fire at an INTACT Pentagon before the wall came down, a wall with a round hole that clearly wasn’t made by an airplane? Neither did I, but 911 IPS has the footage from Fox News. (And just in keeping with the theme of What the Fuck?, do you remember that the FBI found two unexploded bombs in the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City. Neither did I, but 911 IPS has the footage from local coverage.)

Similarly, we see and hear eyewitnesses actually describing the “cruise missile” that hit the pentagon, some saying they didn’t see any windows in the planes that hit the WTCs, others saying the planes definitely didn’t have the American Airlines logo.

“…Dave vonKleist wove several key moments of live, unretouched film footage regarding the events of Sept. 11 into a crystal clear picture of official deception. The entire well-produced documentary is brought into sharp focus with Dave’s impeccably delivered narrative. IPS is hot and should be seen by everyone who has an opinion about what happened Sept. 11, 2001…” The Idaho Observer.

http://www.thepowerhour.com/
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2006/12/prweb493569.htm

Duration : 0:6:42

Read the rest of this entry »

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


In Plane Site- Part 4 of 6

Sunday Nov 16, 2008

“In the phrase ‘conspiracy theory,’ there are two words. The first word, ‘conspiracy,’ the second word is the active word, ‘theory.’ By definition, a theory is a supposition, an idea, a concept, a hypothesis. Let me give you an example: In theory, if I purchase a raffle ticket, I could win a prize. Now as long as I don’t purchase a raffle ticket, my win is theoretical. But once you purchase a raffle ticket, the win is no longer a theory, it becomes a possibility, and the more raffle tickets you purchase, the more possible, and eventually probable, the win becomes. Such is the case with a conspiracy theory. As long as there’s no evidence, it is a conspiracy theory. But once you have a piece of evidence, no matter how flimsy or circumstantial it may be, it becomes a possibility, and the more evidence that is gathered, the more possible, and eventually probable, the conspiracy is.” - Dave vonKleist, host of The Power Hour, in his introduction to 911 IPS.

Narrator Dave vonKleist doesn’t editorialize or draw any conclusions. He simply sits in front of a video screen and points things out. 911 IPS will not bring you to tears like Fahrenheit 9/11. It comes from the brain, not the heart, making it a perfect companion piece. VonKleist asks the same questions that would occur to anybody looking at this footage. What the happened? This does not match the story we’ve all been told. What are those sparks of light that come from both WTC buildings the second before the collisions? It’s definitely not Arabs with box-cutters. If the Pentagon wasn’t hit by an airliner, and it sure looks like it wasn’t, then what the happened to flight 77?

These are big questions that no one seems to be asking, as though we need something else to add to our confusion. We’ll never know what really happened any more than we’ll ever know who killed JFK, but knowing that the official line is a crock of lies is the best jump start we can get on the road to truth.

Do you remember there was a giant explosion that shot 550 feet into the air above the U.S. Customs House at WTC 6, just northwest of the towers before they fell, a totally separate event that clearly had nothing to do with the plane crashes or hijackings, incontrovertible evidence that something else was going on? Neither did I, but 911 IPS has the footage from CNN. Do you remember that the outer wall of the Pentagon didn’t fall down until well after the attack, that firefighters stood there fighting a fire at an INTACT Pentagon before the wall came down, a wall with a round hole that clearly wasn’t made by an airplane? Neither did I, but 911 IPS has the footage from Fox News. (And just in keeping with the theme of What the Fuck?, do you remember that the FBI found two unexploded bombs in the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City. Neither did I, but 911 IPS has the footage from local coverage.)

Similarly, we see and hear eyewitnesses actually describing the “cruise missile” that hit the pentagon, some saying they didn’t see any windows in the planes that hit the WTCs, others saying the planes definitely didn’t have the American Airlines logo.

“…Dave vonKleist wove several key moments of live, unretouched film footage regarding the events of Sept. 11 into a crystal clear picture of official deception. The entire well-produced documentary is brought into sharp focus with Dave’s impeccably delivered narrative. IPS is hot and should be seen by everyone who has an opinion about what happened Sept. 11, 2001…” The Idaho Observer.

http://www.thepowerhour.com/
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2006/12/prweb493569.htm

Duration : 0:9:10

Read the rest of this entry »

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


In Plane Site- Part 3 of 6

Thursday Nov 13, 2008

“In the phrase ‘conspiracy theory,’ there are two words. The first word, ‘conspiracy,’ the second word is the active word, ‘theory.’ By definition, a theory is a supposition, an idea, a concept, a hypothesis. Let me give you an example: In theory, if I purchase a raffle ticket, I could win a prize. Now as long as I don’t purchase a raffle ticket, my win is theoretical. But once you purchase a raffle ticket, the win is no longer a theory, it becomes a possibility, and the more raffle tickets you purchase, the more possible, and eventually probable, the win becomes. Such is the case with a conspiracy theory. As long as there’s no evidence, it is a conspiracy theory. But once you have a piece of evidence, no matter how flimsy or circumstantial it may be, it becomes a possibility, and the more evidence that is gathered, the more possible, and eventually probable, the conspiracy is.” - Dave vonKleist, host of The Power Hour, in his introduction to 911 IPS.

Narrator Dave vonKleist doesn’t editorialize or draw any conclusions. He simply sits in front of a video screen and points things out. 911 IPS will not bring you to tears like Fahrenheit 9/11. It comes from the brain, not the heart, making it a perfect companion piece. VonKleist asks the same questions that would occur to anybody looking at this footage. What the happened? This does not match the story we’ve all been told. What are those sparks of light that come from both WTC buildings the second before the collisions? It’s definitely not Arabs with box-cutters. If the Pentagon wasn’t hit by an airliner, and it sure looks like it wasn’t, then what the happened to flight 77?

These are big questions that no one seems to be asking, as though we need something else to add to our confusion. We’ll never know what really happened any more than we’ll ever know who killed JFK, but knowing that the official line is a crock of lies is the best jump start we can get on the road to truth.

Do you remember there was a giant explosion that shot 550 feet into the air above the U.S. Customs House at WTC 6, just northwest of the towers before they fell, a totally separate event that clearly had nothing to do with the plane crashes or hijackings, incontrovertible evidence that something else was going on? Neither did I, but 911 IPS has the footage from CNN. Do you remember that the outer wall of the Pentagon didn’t fall down until well after the attack, that firefighters stood there fighting a fire at an INTACT Pentagon before the wall came down, a wall with a round hole that clearly wasn’t made by an airplane? Neither did I, but 911 IPS has the footage from Fox News. (And just in keeping with the theme of What the Fuck?, do you remember that the FBI found two unexploded bombs in the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City. Neither did I, but 911 IPS has the footage from local coverage.)

Similarly, we see and hear eyewitnesses actually describing the “cruise missile” that hit the pentagon, some saying they didn’t see any windows in the planes that hit the WTCs, others saying the planes definitely didn’t have the American Airlines logo.

“…Dave vonKleist wove several key moments of live, unretouched film footage regarding the events of Sept. 11 into a crystal clear picture of official deception. The entire well-produced documentary is brought into sharp focus with Dave’s impeccably delivered narrative. IPS is hot and should be seen by everyone who has an opinion about what happened Sept. 11, 2001…” The Idaho Observer.

http://www.thepowerhour.com/
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2006/12/prweb493569.htm

Duration : 0:9:34

Read the rest of this entry »

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


In Plane Site - Part 2 of 6

Tuesday Nov 11, 2008

“In the phrase ‘conspiracy theory,’ there are two words. The first word, ‘conspiracy,’ the second word is the active word, ‘theory.’ By definition, a theory is a supposition, an idea, a concept, a hypothesis. Let me give you an example: In theory, if I purchase a raffle ticket, I could win a prize. Now as long as I don’t purchase a raffle ticket, my win is theoretical. But once you purchase a raffle ticket, the win is no longer a theory, it becomes a possibility, and the more raffle tickets you purchase, the more possible, and eventually probable, the win becomes. Such is the case with a conspiracy theory. As long as there’s no evidence, it is a conspiracy theory. But once you have a piece of evidence, no matter how flimsy or circumstantial it may be, it becomes a possibility, and the more evidence that is gathered, the more possible, and eventually probable, the conspiracy is.” - Dave vonKleist, host of The Power Hour, in his introduction to 911 IPS.

Narrator Dave vonKleist doesn’t editorialize or draw any conclusions. He simply sits in front of a video screen and points things out. 911 IPS will not bring you to tears like Fahrenheit 9/11. It comes from the brain, not the heart, making it a perfect companion piece. VonKleist asks the same questions that would occur to anybody looking at this footage. What the happened? This does not match the story we’ve all been told. What are those sparks of light that come from both WTC buildings the second before the collisions? It’s definitely not Arabs with box-cutters. If the Pentagon wasn’t hit by an airliner, and it sure looks like it wasn’t, then what the happened to flight 77?

These are big questions that no one seems to be asking, as though we need something else to add to our confusion. We’ll never know what really happened any more than we’ll ever know who killed JFK, but knowing that the official line is a crock of lies is the best jump start we can get on the road to truth.

Do you remember there was a giant explosion that shot 550 feet into the air above the U.S. Customs House at WTC 6, just northwest of the towers before they fell, a totally separate event that clearly had nothing to do with the plane crashes or hijackings, incontrovertible evidence that something else was going on? Neither did I, but 911 IPS has the footage from CNN. Do you remember that the outer wall of the Pentagon didn’t fall down until well after the attack, that firefighters stood there fighting a fire at an INTACT Pentagon before the wall came down, a wall with a round hole that clearly wasn’t made by an airplane? Neither did I, but 911 IPS has the footage from Fox News. (And just in keeping with the theme of What the Fuck?, do you remember that the FBI found two unexploded bombs in the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City. Neither did I, but 911 IPS has the footage from local coverage.)

Similarly, we see and hear eyewitnesses actually describing the “cruise missile” that hit the pentagon, some saying they didn’t see any windows in the planes that hit the WTCs, others saying the planes definitely didn’t have the American Airlines logo.

“…Dave vonKleist wove several key moments of live, unretouched film footage regarding the events of Sept. 11 into a crystal clear picture of official deception. The entire well-produced documentary is brought into sharp focus with Dave’s impeccably delivered narrative. IPS is hot and should be seen by everyone who has an opinion about what happened Sept. 11, 2001…” The Idaho Observer.

http://www.thepowerhour.com/
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2006/12/prweb493569.htm

Duration : 0:9:13

Read the rest of this entry »

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


In Plane Site- Part 1 of 6

Friday Nov 7, 2008

“In the phrase ‘conspiracy theory,’ there are two words. The first word, ‘conspiracy,’ the second word is the active word, ‘theory.’ By definition, a theory is a supposition, an idea, a concept, a hypothesis. Let me give you an example: In theory, if I purchase a raffle ticket, I could win a prize. Now as long as I don’t purchase a raffle ticket, my win is theoretical. But once you purchase a raffle ticket, the win is no longer a theory, it becomes a possibility, and the more raffle tickets you purchase, the more possible, and eventually probable, the win becomes. Such is the case with a conspiracy theory. As long as there’s no evidence, it is a conspiracy theory. But once you have a piece of evidence, no matter how flimsy or circumstantial it may be, it becomes a possibility, and the more evidence that is gathered, the more possible, and eventually probable, the conspiracy is.” - Dave vonKleist, host of The Power Hour, in his introduction to 911 IPS.

Narrator Dave vonKleist doesn’t editorialize or draw any conclusions. He simply sits in front of a video screen and points things out. 911 IPS will not bring you to tears like Fahrenheit 9/11. It comes from the brain, not the heart, making it a perfect companion piece. VonKleist asks the same questions that would occur to anybody looking at this footage. What the happened? This does not match the story we’ve all been told. What are those sparks of light that come from both WTC buildings the second before the collisions? It’s definitely not Arabs with box-cutters. If the Pentagon wasn’t hit by an airliner, and it sure looks like it wasn’t, then what the happened to flight 77?

These are big questions that no one seems to be asking, as though we need something else to add to our confusion. We’ll never know what really happened any more than we’ll ever know who killed JFK, but knowing that the official line is a crock of lies is the best jump start we can get on the road to truth.

Do you remember there was a giant explosion that shot 550 feet into the air above the U.S. Customs House at WTC 6, just northwest of the towers before they fell, a totally separate event that clearly had nothing to do with the plane crashes or hijackings, incontrovertible evidence that something else was going on? Neither did I, but 911 IPS has the footage from CNN. Do you remember that the outer wall of the Pentagon didn’t fall down until well after the attack, that firefighters stood there fighting a fire at an INTACT Pentagon before the wall came down, a wall with a round hole that clearly wasn’t made by an airplane? Neither did I, but 911 IPS has the footage from Fox News. (And just in keeping with the theme of What the Fuck?, do you remember that the FBI found two unexploded bombs in the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City. Neither did I, but 911 IPS has the footage from local coverage.)

Similarly, we see and hear eyewitnesses actually describing the “cruise missile” that hit the pentagon, some saying they didn’t see any windows in the planes that hit the WTCs, others saying the planes definitely didn’t have the American Airlines logo.

“…Dave vonKleist wove several key moments of live, unretouched film footage regarding the events of Sept. 11 into a crystal clear picture of official deception. The entire well-produced documentary is brought into sharp focus with Dave’s impeccably delivered narrative. IPS is hot and should be seen by everyone who has an opinion about what happened Sept. 11, 2001…” The Idaho Observer.

http://www.thepowerhour.com/
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2006/12/prweb493569.htm

Duration : 0:9:47

Read the rest of this entry »

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


911 Contradictions to World Trade Center 7 (wtc7) Collapse

Friday Nov 7, 2008

Prior to 911 George Bush was on vacation and was on vacation almost the entire month of august.
after getting elected and up to the day of 911 Bush was on vacation 42% of the time.
the chief of security of the world trade center buildings just happened to be
his younger brother Marvin Bush. Marvin Bush’s last day was one day before 911.
Norad the United States air defence was on a drill on 911 setting the stage
for the greatest public deception ever seen in modern history.
July 24th, 2001. Larry A. Silverstein,
who already owned World Trade Center 7, signs a 3.2 billion dollar,
99-year lease on the entire World Trade Center complex,
six weeks before 9-11.
Included in the lease is a 3.5 billion dollar
insurance policy specifically covering acts of terrorism.

On 911 Planes hit buildings 1 and 2 but no plane hit building 7 which collapsed
8 hrs after the twin towers. Building 7 was also a steel structure building
with impressive welds and bolts holding together it’s very stong fire proof
steel frame.
Sturctural experts and engineers have claimed that steel structure buildings
don’t collapse from fires so some type of explosive would have to be
used such as therminite to make such a building fall.

Today August 21, 2008 on assosiated press airs a report by Federal investigators
that there is no proof of explosives in wtc 7 and fires caused the steel stucture building to collapse
making it only the 3rd steel structure building of it’s kind in history to collapse from
fire behind towers 1 & 2.
In assosiated presses video discription it exlaims the report debunks conpiracy theorist.

wtc7 Consider the facts:

* The fires in WTC 7 were not evenly distributed, so a perfect collapse was impossible.
* Explosions occurred in WTC 7 before it sustained any damage from the twin towers’ collapses.
* Silverstein said to the fire department commander “the smartest thing to do is pull it.”
* Firefighters withdrawing from the area stated the building was going to “blow up” and
to run the building is going to explode.
* The building subsequently collapsed perfectly into its footprint.
* Molten steel and partially evaporated steel members were found in the debris of wtc7

After the initial blast [Flight 11 hitting WTC 1],
Housing Authority worker Barry Jennings, 46,
reported to a command center on the 23rd floor of 7 World Trade Center.
He was with Michael Hess, the city’s corporation counsel,
when they felt and heard another explosion. First calling for help,
they scrambled downstairs to the lobby, or what was left of it.
“I looked around, the lobby was gone. It looked like hell,”
Jennings said. [Traverse City Record Eagle 9/11/2001]

My theory is all the building were rigged for detonation prior to 911
but there was a missing plane that did not hit wtc7 but the detonators
went off anyway. Jets can not knock down steel structures but to the
untrained public eye this was a good reason for war do to terrorist attacts.
Naturally an accident can not be investigated when it’s done by the intelligence
agencies themself and all the evidence removed and accounted for.

World trade center 7 is at the top of this diagram. It is seperated
from the twin towers by buildings 6 and 5.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kRaKHq2dfCI
http://www.loosechange911.com/blog/

Duration : 0:6:11

Read the rest of this entry »

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


9 11 - Tower 7 Conspiracy Part.4

Tuesday Nov 4, 2008

Go to http://Tower7conspiracy.com/ to find out more.

7 World Trade Center is a building in New York City located across from the World Trade Center site in Lower Manhattan. The name “7 World Trade Center” has referred to two buildings: the original structure, completed in 1987, and the current structure. The original building was destroyed on September 11, 2001 and replaced with the new 7 World Trade Center, which opened in 2006. Both buildings were developed by Larry Silverstein, who holds a ground lease for the site from the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey.

Go to http://Tower7conspiracy.com/ to find out more.

Duration : 0:10:30

Read the rest of this entry »

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


“How the Towers Fell” (13 of 13)-Architect Richard Gage

Friday Sep 5, 2008

If you have a closed mind about what happened on 911 and you have bought into the “official” conspiracy theory, don’t bother watching this.

If you wish to honor the memory of those who were massacred on 911 by relentlessly probing for the truth of what happened, carry on and watch these videos of a presentation by Architect Richard Gage as he meticulously examines the facts of 911.

Why are Architects and Engineers Re-examining the WTC Collapses?
Jan 1, 2007
— Richard Gage, AIA

The 6 years since 9/11/01 has given us the time and space to emerge from the hypnotic trance of the shocks of these attacks and to rationally evaluate the existing and new evidence that has become available.

Architects and Engineers are trained to design buildings that function well and withstand potentially destructive forces. However, the 3 high-rise buildings at the World Trade Center which “collapsed” on 9/11 (the Twin Towers plus WTC Building #7) presented us with a body of evidence (i.e.controlled demolition) that was clearly outside the scope of our training and experience.

In addition, the shock that hit us on that date from the repeated attacks and staggering loss of life has limited our ability to rationally evaluate what really happened. We therefore found ourselves relying solely upon the judgment of outside “experts”…

and, quite willing to, “go along” with the collective myth that has unfolded: that “the buildings failed structurally due to the aircraft impacts and resulting fires”. After all, we saw the aircraft slam into the building, the resulting huge fireball, and the ensuing “collapses”.

There is however a growing body of very solid evidence regarding these “collapses” that has emerged in the last couple of years - gaining ground even in the mainstream media. This new evidence casts grave doubt upon the theories of the 9/11 building collapse “experts” as well as the official reports by the 9/11 Commission, FEMA, and NIST.

It lays out a solid convincing case which architects & engineers will readily see: that the 3 WTC high-rise buildings were destroyed by both classic and novel forms of controlled demolition. You will find the evidence here in our website (http://ae911truth.org) as well as at the linked websites. We hope you will find the courage and take the necessary time to review each section thoroughly.

After all, if in fact these buildings were professionally demolished with explosives, and since it takes months of planning and engineering to place the explosives, and since these buildings were highly secure from the likes of terrorists, then we are presented with a horrible conclusion that we can not deny: that this entire event could only have been planned and orchestrated by some element(s) within the U.S. Government. The questions raised are therefore numerous and ominous that must be answered in the context of a truly independent congressional investigation with subpoena power. We can play a very significant role as building professionals because we have the necessary technical credibility that Congress will respond to. Please join us in calling for a re-investigation.

“I remember getting a call from the fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, ‘We’ve had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.’ And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse.”

— Larry Silverstein - WTC Lease Holder

Duration : 0:6:8

Read the rest of this entry »

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


“How the Towers Fell” (12 of 13)-Architect Richard Gage

Thursday Sep 4, 2008

If you have a closed mind about what happened on 911 and you have bought into the “official” conspiracy theory, don’t bother watching this.

If you wish to honor the memory of those who were massacred on 911 by relentlessly probing for the truth of what happened, carry on and watch these videos of a presentation by Architect Richard Gage as he meticulously examines the facts of 911.

Why are Architects and Engineers Re-examining the WTC Collapses?
Jan 1, 2007
— Richard Gage, AIA

The 6 years since 9/11/01 has given us the time and space to emerge from the hypnotic trance of the shocks of these attacks and to rationally evaluate the existing and new evidence that has become available.

Architects and Engineers are trained to design buildings that function well and withstand potentially destructive forces. However, the 3 high-rise buildings at the World Trade Center which “collapsed” on 9/11 (the Twin Towers plus WTC Building #7) presented us with a body of evidence (i.e.controlled demolition) that was clearly outside the scope of our training and experience.

In addition, the shock that hit us on that date from the repeated attacks and staggering loss of life has limited our ability to rationally evaluate what really happened. We therefore found ourselves relying solely upon the judgment of outside “experts”…

and, quite willing to, “go along” with the collective myth that has unfolded: that “the buildings failed structurally due to the aircraft impacts and resulting fires”. After all, we saw the aircraft slam into the building, the resulting huge fireball, and the ensuing “collapses”.

There is however a growing body of very solid evidence regarding these “collapses” that has emerged in the last couple of years - gaining ground even in the mainstream media. This new evidence casts grave doubt upon the theories of the 9/11 building collapse “experts” as well as the official reports by the 9/11 Commission, FEMA, and NIST.

It lays out a solid convincing case which architects & engineers will readily see: that the 3 WTC high-rise buildings were destroyed by both classic and novel forms of controlled demolition. You will find the evidence here in our website (http://ae911truth.org) as well as at the linked websites. We hope you will find the courage and take the necessary time to review each section thoroughly.

After all, if in fact these buildings were professionally demolished with explosives, and since it takes months of planning and engineering to place the explosives, and since these buildings were highly secure from the likes of terrorists, then we are presented with a horrible conclusion that we can not deny: that this entire event could only have been planned and orchestrated by some element(s) within the U.S. Government. The questions raised are therefore numerous and ominous that must be answered in the context of a truly independent congressional investigation with subpoena power. We can play a very significant role as building professionals because we have the necessary technical credibility that Congress will respond to. Please join us in calling for a re-investigation.

“I remember getting a call from the fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, ‘We’ve had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.’ And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse.”

— Larry Silverstein - WTC Lease Holder

Duration : 0:5:30

Read the rest of this entry »

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Strong theme by partnerstvo & partnership & aerography.